Screener
BFOR vs RODM
Barron's 400 ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
Key differences
- RODM costs 0.36% less per year.
- RODM is significantly larger than BFOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BFOR covers north america markets; RODM covers global.
- BFOR follows a index tracking strategy; RODM uses index enhanced.
Side-by-side comparison
| BFOR | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2013 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 2.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 10.77% |
| Max drawdown | -41.27% | -35.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BFOR and RODM
Explore further