Screener
BIBL vs BTR
Inspire 100 ETF vs Beacon Tactical Risk ETF
Key differences
- BIBL costs 0.73% less per year.
- BIBL is significantly larger than BTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BIBL is classified as equity, while BTR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- BIBL follows a index tracking strategy; BTR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BIBL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BIBL | BTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 1.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $37M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 1.19% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.2% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.38% | 9.77% |
| Max drawdown | -36.12% | -16.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BIBL and BTR
Explore further