Screener
BIBL vs BSR
Inspire 100 ETF vs Pacific Select Fund
Key differences
- BIBL costs 0.74% less per year.
- BIBL is significantly larger than BSR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BIBL is classified as equity, while BSR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- BIBL follows a index tracking strategy; BSR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BIBL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BIBL | BSR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 1.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $39M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 1.02% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.2% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.38% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -36.12% | -15.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BIBL and BSR
Explore further