Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BILT vs SYSB

iShares Infrastructure Active ETF vs iShares Systematic Bond ETF

BILT

iShares Infrastructure Active ETF

BlackRock

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$26M

SYSB

iShares Systematic Bond ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$1.0B

Key differences

  • SYSB costs 0.35% less per year.
  • SYSB is significantly larger than BILT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BILT is classified as equity, while SYSB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
  • BILT follows a active selection strategy; SYSB uses index tracking.
  • SYSB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BILTSYSB
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.25%
Fund size (AUM)$26M$1.0B
Since20252015
Dividend yield4.64%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+5.7%
CAGR 3YN/A+6.5%
CAGR 5YN/A+1.5%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.66
Volatility 1Y3.78%
Max drawdown-5.38%-18.47%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BILT and SYSB