Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BINC vs MEAR

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.9B

MEAR

iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.26%

Fund size

$1.3B

Key differences

  • MEAR costs 0.14% less per year.
  • BINC is significantly larger than MEAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MEAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BINCMEAR
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.26%
Fund size (AUM)$16.9B$1.3B
Since20232015
Dividend yield5.60%2.87%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+6.3%+3.3%
CAGR 3YN/A+3.6%
CAGR 5YN/A+2.4%
Sharpe 3YN/A-0.02
Volatility 1Y2.29%0.86%
Max drawdown-2.69%-2.68%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BINC and MEAR