Screener
BITS vs IGF
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.26% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than BITS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BITS is classified as cryptocurrency, while IGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BITS follows a active selection strategy; IGF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BITS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BITS | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $10.7B |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 22.55% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +55.6% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.62% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -83.11% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BITS and IGF
Explore further