Screener
BITS vs RYLD
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- RYLD costs 0.05% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than BITS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BITS is classified as cryptocurrency, while RYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BITS follows a active selection strategy; RYLD uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, BITS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BITS | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 22.55% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +55.6% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.62% | 10.84% |
| Max drawdown | -83.11% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BITS and RYLD
Explore further