Screener
BITS vs RYLG
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- RYLG costs 0.30% less per year.
- BITS is significantly larger than RYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BITS is classified as cryptocurrency, while RYLG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BITS follows a active selection strategy; RYLG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, BITS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BITS | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $8M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 22.55% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +55.6% | +13.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.62% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -83.11% | -22.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BITS and RYLG
Explore further