Screener
BLCR vs CNYA
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
Both BLCR and CNYA are equity ETFs. BLCR charges 0.36% a year and CNYA 0.60%. The main difference: BLCR follows a active selection strategy; CNYA uses index tracking.
- BLCR follows a active selection strategy; CNYA uses index tracking.
- BLCR covers global markets; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- BLCR costs 0.24% less per year.
- BLCR is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CNYA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCR | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.0B | $242M |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 1.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.5% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.90% | 17.67% |
| Max drawdown | -21.29% | -49.48% |
Similar to BLCR and CNYA
Explore further