Screener
BNDS vs IFRA
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF vs iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IFRA costs 0.58% less per year.
- IFRA is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BNDS is classified as alternative, while IFRA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BNDS follows a multi strategy strategy; IFRA uses index tracking.
- IFRA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDS | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $4.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 7.93% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.3% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.60% | 14.82% |
| Max drawdown | -6.95% | -41.06% |
Similar to BNDS and IFRA
Explore further