Screener
BNDS vs IGF
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.49% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BNDS is classified as alternative, while IGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BNDS covers north america markets; IGF covers global.
- BNDS follows a multi strategy strategy; IGF uses index tracking.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDS | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $10.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 7.93% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.3% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.60% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -6.95% | -42.11% |
Similar to BNDS and IGF
Explore further