Screener
BOND vs LDUR
PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- BOND is significantly larger than LDUR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BOND follows a active selection strategy; LDUR uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOND | LDUR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.9B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2012 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 5.17% | 4.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | +2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.00% | 1.56% |
| Max drawdown | -19.71% | -8.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BOND and LDUR
Explore further