Screener
BOND vs MUNI
PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- MUNI costs 0.19% less per year.
- BOND follows a active selection strategy; MUNI uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BOND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOND | MUNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.9B | $2.9B |
| Since | 2012 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 5.17% | 3.28% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +3.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | -0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.00% | 2.26% |
| Max drawdown | -19.71% | -11.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BOND and MUNI
Explore further