Screener
BPAY vs IWL
iShares FinTech Active ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
BPAY is an alternative ETF, while IWL is an equity ETF. BPAY charges 0.55% a year and IWL 0.15%.
- BPAY is an alternative fund, while IWL is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- BPAY follows a active selection strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- BPAY covers global markets; IWL covers North America.
- IWL costs 0.40% less per year.
- IWL is much larger than BPAY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BPAY | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2022 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.79% | 0.82% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -13.7% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.44% | 12.52% |
| Max drawdown | -33.62% | -32.71% |
Similar to BPAY and IWL
Explore further