Screener
BPAY vs IWR
iShares FinTech Active ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
BPAY is an alternative ETF, while IWR is an equity ETF. BPAY charges 0.55% a year and IWR 0.18%.
- BPAY is an alternative fund, while IWR is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- BPAY follows a active selection strategy; IWR uses index tracking.
- BPAY covers global markets; IWR covers North America.
- IWR costs 0.37% less per year.
- IWR is much larger than BPAY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BPAY | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $54.8B |
| Since | 2022 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.79% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -13.7% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.44% | 13.54% |
| Max drawdown | -33.62% | -40.59% |
Similar to BPAY and IWR
Explore further