Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BPAY vs IWR

iShares FinTech Active ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

BPAY

iShares FinTech Active ETF

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$9M

IWR

iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$54.8B

Key differences

BPAY is an alternative ETF, while IWR is an equity ETF. BPAY charges 0.55% a year and IWR 0.18%.

  • BPAY is an alternative fund, while IWR is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • BPAY follows a active selection strategy; IWR uses index tracking.
  • BPAY covers global markets; IWR covers North America.
  • IWR costs 0.37% less per year.
  • IWR is much larger than BPAY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, IWR has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BPAYIWR
Annual cost (TER)0.55%0.18%
Fund size (AUM)$9M$54.8B
Since20222001
Dividend yield2.79%1.16%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y-13.7%+19.9%
CAGR 3Y+8.9%+17.8%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.7%
Sharpe 3Y0.330.89
Volatility 1Y26.44%13.54%
Max drawdown-33.62%-40.59%

Similar to BPAY and IWR