Screener
BREM vs EMBD
iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.11% less per year.
- EMBD is significantly larger than BREM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BREM follows a index tracking strategy; EMBD uses active selection.
- EMBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BREM | EMBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $256M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.67% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +10.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.04% |
| Max drawdown | -4.54% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BREM and EMBD
Explore further