Screener
BRLN vs FLRN
iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
Key differences
- FLRN costs 0.40% less per year.
- FLRN is significantly larger than BRLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BRLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FLRN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BRLN | FLRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2022 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 6.51% | 4.63% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.4% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.03% | 0.68% |
| Max drawdown | -3.85% | -14.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BRLN and FLRN
Explore further