Screener
BTGD vs AAAU
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF vs Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
Key differences
BTGD is an alternative ETF, while AAAU is a commodity ETF. BTGD charges 1.05% a year and AAAU 0.18%.
- BTGD is an alternative fund, while AAAU is a commodity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- AAAU costs 0.87% less per year.
- AAAU is much larger than BTGD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAAU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BTGD | AAAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.05% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.08% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | commodity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | — |
| CAGR 1Y | -37.2% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +29.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 55.77% | 26.58% |
| Max drawdown | -53.31% | -21.63% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.