Screener
BTR vs BIBL
Beacon Tactical Risk ETF vs Inspire 100 ETF
Key differences
- BIBL costs 0.73% less per year.
- BIBL is significantly larger than BTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BTR is classified as mixed asset, while BIBL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BTR follows a active selection strategy; BIBL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BIBL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BTR | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.08% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $436M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +38.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.77% | 15.38% |
| Max drawdown | -16.67% | -36.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BTR and BIBL
Explore further