Screener
CBON vs ECNS
VanEck China Bond ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
CBON is a fixed income ETF, while ECNS is an equity ETF. CBON charges 0.50% a year and ECNS 0.59%.
- CBON is a fixed income fund, while ECNS is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- CBON costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last three years, ECNS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CBON | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $71M |
| Since | 2014 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 6.40% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.6% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.8% | -7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.46% | 21.06% |
| Max drawdown | -14.13% | -63.44% |
Similar to CBON and ECNS
Explore further