Screener
CCNR vs APUE
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- APUE costs 0.08% less per year.
- APUE is significantly larger than CCNR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCNR covers global markets; APUE covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCNR | APUE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $394M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.77% | 0.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.9% | +30.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 12.36% |
| Max drawdown | -20.06% | -18.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCNR and APUE
Explore further