Screener
CCNR vs CTEC
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs Global X ClimateTech ETF
Key differences
- CCNR costs 0.11% less per year.
- CCNR is significantly larger than CTEC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCNR follows a active selection strategy; CTEC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCNR | CTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $394M | $30M |
| Since | 2024 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.77% | 0.59% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.9% | +124.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +1.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 34.99% |
| Max drawdown | -20.06% | -81.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCNR and CTEC
Explore further