Screener
CCNR vs FRNW
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- CCNR follows a active selection strategy; FRNW uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCNR | FRNW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $394M | $141M |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.77% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.9% | +84.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 25.62% |
| Max drawdown | -20.06% | -59.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCNR and FRNW
Explore further