Screener
CCNR vs ICLN
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN is significantly larger than CCNR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCNR follows a active selection strategy; ICLN uses index tracking.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCNR | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $394M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.77% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.9% | +78.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 25.99% |
| Max drawdown | -20.06% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCNR and ICLN
Explore further