Screener
CCNR vs PBD
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- CCNR costs 0.36% less per year.
- CCNR follows a active selection strategy; PBD uses index tracking.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCNR | PBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $394M | $208M |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.77% | 1.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.9% | +88.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 23.23% |
| Max drawdown | -20.06% | -75.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCNR and PBD
Explore further