Screener
CCOR vs FFLS
Core Alternative ETF vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Key differences
- CCOR costs 0.31% less per year.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; FFLS uses long short.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 1.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $42M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 0.13% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | -0.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 8.87% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -11.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and FFLS
Explore further