Screener
CCOR vs MKAM
Core Alternative ETF vs Mkam Etf
Key differences
Both CCOR and MKAM are alternative ETFs. CCOR charges 1.29% a year and MKAM 0.53%. The main difference: CCOR follows a option income strategy; MKAM uses active selection.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; MKAM uses active selection.
- MKAM costs 0.76% less per year.
- Over the last three years, MKAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | MKAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $13M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 2.90% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -3.9% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.4% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.21% | 6.19% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -5.01% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.