Screener
CCOR vs XQQI
Core Alternative ETF vs NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
Key differences
Both CCOR and XQQI are alternative ETFs. CCOR charges 1.29% a year and XQQI 0.98%. The main difference: XQQI costs 0.31% less per year.
- XQQI costs 0.31% less per year.
- XQQI is much larger than CCOR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | XQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $183M |
| Since | 2017 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -3.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.22% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -12.53% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.