Screener
CEFS vs BDYN
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 2.21% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than CEFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CEFS is classified as alternative, while BDYN is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and BDYN
Explore further