Screener
CEFS vs BFLX
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 2.21% less per year.
- CEFS is classified as alternative, while BFLX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CEFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | — |
| Since | 2017 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | 0.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and BFLX
Explore further