Screener
CEFS vs CGSM
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSM costs 2.36% less per year.
- CEFS is classified as alternative, while CGSM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- CEFS follows a active selection strategy; CGSM uses index tracking.
- CEFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | CGSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | 1.33% |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -1.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and CGSM
Explore further