Screener
CEFS vs DCRE
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate Debt ETF
Key differences
- DCRE costs 2.22% less per year.
- CEFS follows a active selection strategy; DCRE uses multi strategy.
- Over the last 3 years, CEFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CEFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | DCRE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | $429M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | 1.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | 1.15% |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -0.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and DCRE
Explore further