Screener
CFIT vs GAA
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF vs Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
Key differences
- GAA costs 0.10% less per year.
- GAA is significantly larger than CFIT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CFIT is classified as fixed income, while GAA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- GAA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CFIT | GAA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $69M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 3.62% |
| Asset class | fixed income | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.1% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.48% | 9.11% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -26.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CFIT and GAA
Explore further