Screener
CFIT vs GMOM
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF vs Cambria Global Momentum ETF
Key differences
- CFIT costs 0.51% less per year.
- GMOM is significantly larger than CFIT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CFIT is classified as fixed income, while GMOM is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CFIT follows a active selection strategy; GMOM uses systematic alpha.
- GMOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CFIT | GMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $140M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 1.58% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.1% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.48% | 13.57% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -19.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CFIT and GMOM
Explore further