Screener
CFIT vs TRTY
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF vs Cambria Trinity ETF
Key differences
- TRTY is significantly larger than CFIT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CFIT is classified as fixed income, while TRTY is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CFIT follows a active selection strategy; TRTY uses multi strategy.
- TRTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CFIT | TRTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $143M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 3.01% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.1% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.48% | 9.53% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -22.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CFIT and TRTY
Explore further