Screener
CFIT vs ILTB
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF vs iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- ILTB costs 0.44% less per year.
- ILTB is significantly larger than CFIT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CFIT follows a active selection strategy; ILTB uses index tracking.
- ILTB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CFIT | ILTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $588M |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 4.94% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +8.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.49% | 8.08% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -36.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CFIT and ILTB
Explore further