Screener
CFIT vs ISTB
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF vs iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- ISTB costs 0.44% less per year.
- ISTB is significantly larger than CFIT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CFIT follows a active selection strategy; ISTB uses index tracking.
- ISTB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CFIT | ISTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 4.20% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.49% | 1.78% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -9.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CFIT and ISTB
Explore further