Screener
CFIT vs IMTB
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF vs iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- IMTB costs 0.44% less per year.
- IMTB is significantly larger than CFIT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CFIT follows a active selection strategy; IMTB uses index tracking.
- IMTB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CFIT | IMTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $280M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 4.46% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.49% | 4.07% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -18.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CFIT and IMTB
Explore further