Screener
CFIT vs ENDW
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF vs Cambria Endowment Style ETF
Key differences
- ENDW costs 0.28% less per year.
- ENDW is significantly larger than CFIT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CFIT is classified as fixed income, while ENDW is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CFIT covers north america markets; ENDW covers global.
- CFIT follows a active selection strategy; ENDW uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| CFIT | ENDW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $139M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.1% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.48% | 10.19% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -6.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CFIT and ENDW
Explore further