Screener
CGBL vs OACP
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF vs OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF
Key differences
- CGBL costs 0.41% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than OACP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGBL is classified as mixed asset, while OACP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- CGBL follows a active selection strategy; OACP uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGBL | OACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.74% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.1B | $256M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.92% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.0% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.69% | 3.58% |
| Max drawdown | -11.66% | -11.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGBL and OACP
Explore further