Screener
CGGR vs IPAC
Capital Group Growth ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both CGGR and IPAC are equity ETFs. CGGR charges 0.39% a year and IPAC 0.09%. The main difference: CGGR follows a active selection strategy; IPAC uses index tracking.
- CGGR follows a active selection strategy; IPAC uses index tracking.
- CGGR covers global markets; IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- IPAC costs 0.30% less per year.
- CGGR is much larger than IPAC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, CGGR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IPAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGR | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24.4B | $2.6B |
| Since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.09% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.7% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.76% | 16.74% |
| Max drawdown | -28.90% | -31.00% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.