Screener
IPAC vs CGGO
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
Both IPAC and CGGO are equity ETFs. IPAC charges 0.09% a year and CGGO 0.47%. The main difference: IPAC follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- IPAC follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region; CGGO covers global markets.
- IPAC costs 0.38% less per year.
- CGGO is much larger than IPAC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IPAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAC | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $11.3B |
| Since | 2014 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.80% | 1.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.74% | 17.47% |
| Max drawdown | -31.00% | -24.90% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.