Screener
CGMS vs FUSI
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF vs American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF
Key differences
- FUSI costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGMS is significantly larger than FUSI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGMS is classified as fixed income, while FUSI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CGMS follows a index tracking strategy; FUSI uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, CGMS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGMS | FUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.7B | $23M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.93% | 5.44% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.9% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 2.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.49% | 0.90% |
| Max drawdown | -4.08% | -0.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGMS and FUSI
Explore further