Screener
CGW vs EEMO
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
Key differences
- EEMO costs 0.29% less per year.
- CGW is significantly larger than EEMO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EEMO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CGW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | EEMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $13M |
| Since | 2007 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 1.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +51.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 24.28% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -46.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and EEMO
Explore further