Screener
CGW vs PHO
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco Water Resources ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, CGW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2007 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | -1.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -34.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and PHO
Explore further