Screener
CGW vs PIE
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
Key differences
- CGW costs 0.32% less per year.
- CGW is significantly larger than PIE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGW follows a index tracking strategy; PIE uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PIE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | PIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $201M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 1.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +71.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 21.91% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -40.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and PIE
Explore further