Screener
CGW vs RZG
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RZG costs 0.23% less per year.
- CGW is significantly larger than RZG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RZG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $121M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +36.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 18.69% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -54.02% |
Similar to CGW and RZG
Explore further