Screener
CLOA vs IGLB
iShares AAA CLO Active ETF vs iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- IGLB costs 0.16% less per year.
- CLOA follows a active selection strategy; IGLB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CLOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGLB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOA | IGLB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $2.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 5.09% | 5.28% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.8% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.57 | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.72% | 8.01% |
| Max drawdown | -1.34% | -34.12% |
Similar to CLOA and IGLB
Explore further