Screener
CLOB vs QLTA
Vaneck Aa-bb Clo Etf vs iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- QLTA costs 0.30% less per year.
- QLTA is significantly larger than CLOB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CLOB follows a active selection strategy; QLTA uses index tracking.
- QLTA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOB | QLTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $167M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 6.55% | 4.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.03% | 4.44% |
| Max drawdown | -5.54% | -22.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOB and QLTA
Explore further