Screener
CLOI vs IIGD
VanEck CLO ETF vs Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
Key differences
- IIGD costs 0.23% less per year.
- CLOI is significantly larger than IIGD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CLOI follows a active selection strategy; IIGD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CLOI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOI | IIGD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $31M |
| Since | 2022 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 5.44% | 4.27% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.21% | 2.32% |
| Max drawdown | -3.36% | -11.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOI and IIGD
Explore further